![]() ![]() So it’s good news for stock buyers, but not such good news for photographers. A single on-demand image will cost a buyer just $9.99 but if they choose an Adobe Stock subscription – by far the most cost-effective and most likely option – they will be paying a lot less.įor example, the middle-tier Adobe Stock subscription comes with 10 images a month for just £20/month in the UK, which works out at £2 per image. One of Adobe Stock’s big selling points for buyers is that images are cheap. Mind you, that could end up being 33% or 35% of not very much. This review is written for stock photography ‘newbies’ tempted by Adobe Stock’s integration with Adobe’s desktop apps, the association with a big, respected brand and Adobe’s claims you’ll be reaching “the world’s largest creative community” – that your work will be seen by global buyers and that you’ll get “best in class royalties” of 33% for photos and 35% for video. If so, Adobe Stock could be a turning point. You may have thought about submitting to stock libraries before, but been put off by the size of the market and the competition, the difficulty (or imagined difficulty) of getting accepted by a stock library and the day to day hassle of selecting, keywording and uploading images. That’s the focus of this Adobe Stock review. ![]() But if you’re a photographer, Adobe Stock is interesting in a very different way, as an opportunity to make money from stock sales of your own work, especially since you don’t have to be a Creative Cloud subscriber to submit images – you just need an Adobe ID. If you’re a designer or an illustrator you might have an interest in Adobe Stock as a quick and cost-effective way to find and buy stock images to suit your projects. Update: My first batch of images has passed through the Adobe Stock review process.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |